So why is the second novel so hard? I think there are a few possibilities. A first novel often has autobiographical elements - mine certainly did - and you are spending time with people and in places that you know intimately. The second novel is often more removed, requiring more research and more technique. I think that the second novel could also be a more conscious and more constructed thing than the first. Writing is a job now. You are an author with a capital A, with all the expectations that brings, and you feel more pressure to deliver something competent, with no 'I'm a newbie' excuses. Personally, I feel like having a busy and chaotic year hasn't helped. At least, I'm sure the experiences of this year will help with my writing further down the track, but at the moment they're just making it harder to concentrate. I almost need to cultivate a sort of deliberate boredom to really concentrate on writing - narrow my focus right down, have a rigid routine and remove all distractions so that I have nothing else to do BUT write.
I think my conclusion, after all this, is to stop navel-gazing and second-guessing myself and to just get on with it. And then I can start complaining about the Difficult Third Novel.
"The problem with a second novel is that it takes almost no time to write compared with a first novel. If I write my first novel in a month at the age of 23, and my second novel takes me two years, which have I written more quickly? The second, of course. The first took 23 years, and contains all the experience, pain, stored-up artistry, anger, love, hope, comic invention and despair of that lifetime. The second is an act of professional writing. That is why it is so much more difficult." - Stephen Fry
No comments:
Post a Comment